[Mimedefang] Clamav milter or call from MIMEDefang?
John Barton
jbarton at technicalworks.net
Thu Sep 23 16:22:57 EDT 2004
Matthew.van.Eerde at hbinc.com wrote:
> John Barton wrote:
>
>>... I dont want to waste time processing with mimedefang if clamav
>>knows it is a virus, but I dont want to have to scan in MD all the time to catch
>>what gets by the clamav milter.
>
>
> What you might do to get the most bang for your CPU cycle is:
> 1) Run clamav-milter first - this should catch most known viruses
> 2) Scan in MIMEDefang using some OTHER virus engine
I dont think I am going to save a lot if I implement this, because I
will still be scanning every message with MIMEDefang. This would almost
certainly help the server during a flood of new activity, but the ratio
of virus to legit mail isnt high enough for this to be helpful all the
time. I will be running File::Scan on the machine through MD, but I
would not expect it to catch something that clamav missed..
-John
--
John Barton
jbarton at technicalworks.net
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list