[Mimedefang] Is this mimedefang or spamassassin? re-send

[Bill Maidment]

Paul Murphy wrote:
> Bill,
> 
> See
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2004-September/024386.html
> - I looked into this a while back, and it seems to be due to a bug in the code.
> 
> The solution is to use SA 3.0 and switch to the SQL backend for the Bayes and
> AWL databases, since the DBM code has always been a bit flaky in multi-user
> environments, which multi-slave MD is of course.
> 
>

Thanks for that. It does confirm some of my suspicions.
However, I have got round the problem, rather than solve it, by adding 
"lock_method flock" to /etc/mail/spamassassin.local.cf as suggested in 
the UPGRADE notes. i.e. I avoid NFS where the error seems to come from.

Cheers

-- 
      _/_/_/_/      _/  _/
     _/    _/  _/  _/  _/
    _/_/_/        _/  _/
   _/    _/  _/  _/  _/
  _/_/_/_/  _/  _/  _/

Bill Maidment
Maidment Enterprises Pty Ltd

Unless you are named "Alfred E. Newman", you may read only the "odd 
numbered words" (every other word beginning with the first) of the 
message above. If you have violated that, then you hereby owe the sender 
AU$10 for each even numbered word you have read.
Adapted from "Stupid Email Disclaimers" (see 
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/)