[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang + spamd
David F. Skoll
dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Wed Sep 22 22:07:17 EDT 2004
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, John Scully wrote:
> On any system with a lot of rule sets SA represents about 90% of the total
> message prosessing time. C vs perl makes a difference on that part.
???
But spamd is written in pure Perl -- there's not an ounce of C there.
So you're saying that invoking spamc, which involves a fork and exec,
followed by transmitting the message to the Perl spamd and getting the answer
back, is faster than calling the Perl API directly? I don't doubt your
measurements, but they must have been done under some pretty strange
conditions.
Regards,
David.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list