[Mimedefang] Spamassassin+Mimedefang header formatting...

jbird at micron.com jbird at micron.com
Tue May 18 10:51:55 EDT 2004


Take a look at your .cf file and see if you have any of the report
template config lines.  Something like these maybe:

clear_report_template
report SpamAssassin v_VERSION_ report
report " pts rule name              description"
report  ---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
report _SUMMARY_


John


-----Original Message-----
From: mimedefang-bounces at lists.roaringpenguin.com
[mailto:mimedefang-bounces at lists.roaringpenguin.com] On Behalf Of Ross
Kramer
Sent: Mon, 17 May, 2004 11:53
To: mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: [Mimedefang] Spamassassin+Mimedefang header formatting...


Here's an interesting conundrum:

I have two servers, one running RedHat 9 and the other running SuSE 9.
They both have the same versions of mimedefang (2.43) installed and the
same version of spamassassin (2.55). I have configured the
mimedefang-filter on both systems to attach the SA headers into the
header, both also with Terse Reports set to 1. My output per header per
system is as follows:

Redhat 9

X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.7 required=3.8
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Report: ---- Start Filter results
 6.70 hits, 3.8 required;
 *  0.1 -- BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list
 *  0.2 -- BODY: Talks about getting a discount
 *  0.2 -- BODY: Obfuscated 'online' in body
 *  3.0 -- BODY: Links to spamdomain.com
 *  0.0 -- BODY: credit card
 *  0.1 -- BODY: Gives a lame excuse about why you were sent this spam
 *  0.6 -- URI: URL of page called "remove"
 *  0.8 -- URI: Includes a 'remove' email address
 *  0.5 -- 'Message-Id' was added by a relay (3)
 *  1.2 -- Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date

SuSE 9

X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.7 required=3.8
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Report: ---- Start Filter results 6.70 hits, 3.8 required; * 
0.2 -- BODY: Talks about getting a discount *  0.1 -- BODY: Gives a lame
excuse about why you were sent this spam *  3.0 -- BODY: Links to
spamdomain.com *  0.2 -- BODY: Obfuscated 'online' in body *  0.1 --
BODY: Claims you can be removed from the list *  0.0 -- BODY: credit
card *  0.6 -- URI: URL of page called "remove" *  0.8 -- URI: Includes
a 'remove' email address *  0.5 * 'Message-Id' was added by a relay (3)
*  1.2 -- Date: is 96 hours or more before Received: date

So the question is kind of hovering around "WTF?" 

Anybody have any idea as to why there's a formatting difference?

Thx,

-R

"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion,
It is by the beans of Java the thoughts acquire speed, 
the hands acquire shakes,
the shakes are a damn nuisance,
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion." 
-- The Liturgy of Caffeine
_______________________________________________
Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca MIMEDefang
mailing list MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list