[Mimedefang] MD I/O intensive?

Aaron Paetznick aaronp at critd.com
Mon Mar 15 18:35:16 EST 2004


I'm even willing to try Reiser4.  Anybody tested this with MIMEDefang? 
It supposed to be about twice as fast at everything except deleting, but 
it also uses twice as much CPU.


--Aaron



Lucas Albers wrote:

> Andrew J Caird said:
> 
>>email), but several small, fast disks would serve you well.  The ideal
>>situation (well, in my opinion) is: one disk for OS and logs; one disk for
>>/var/spool/mqueue; one disk for the MD quarantine; enough RAM for a
>>RAMdisk for
>>MD's working directory.  If these servers will handle outgoing email,
>>you'll
>>need a bigger mqueue, probably.  If you have multiple controllers, you can
>>put
>>either mqueue or the MD quarantine on its own controller.
> 
> I read somewhere that reiserfs is faster then ext3 on small file
> deletion/creation.
> Typical mail load.
> On a high load site, would type of file system really matter?
> 



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list