[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.40 is released
Josh Kelley
josh at jbc.edu
Fri Mar 5 14:37:35 EST 2004
David F. Skoll wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Josh Kelley wrote:
>
>>he mimedefang-filter manpage still recommends using action_bounce
>>rather than action_discard. Is action_bounce no longer recommended?
>>
>>
>Right. I should fix the man page.
>
I'm sure that this topic has come up many times on the list before, and
I'm sorry for bringing it up again, but the last time I remember seeing
it discussed here, I thought that the general consensus was that bounce
was better, for roughly the following reasons:
1. Most mass-mailing viruses are sent directly by the virus, in which
case no one will see any bounces generated.
2. Bounces will be generated anyway, if a mass-mailed virus is sent to
an invalid email address, so avoiding action_bounce won't stop bounced
viruses.
3. If the the virus is, for example, a Word macro virus, it shouldn't
be silently dropped.
4. To summarize, in the man page's words, "It's almost never a good
idea to hide a problem."
Why the change in recommendation?
Again, sorry for rehashing old material.
Josh Kelley
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list