[Mimedefang] SA body filters tagging header contents

[Michael Haren]

alan,

You're right, the meta rule for this is simple enough. I guess I was
just so surprised that this was normal behavior. I understand why this
is the case, it just wasn't expected.

Thanks for the advice, take care!

--
Michael

alan premselaar wrote:

>On 04.3.3 7:57 AM, "Michael Haren" <michael at wassupy.com> wrote:
>...snip... 
>  
>
>>Now I must ask, does anyone know of any convenient way to scan only the
>>body of the message, without the subject? Without creating meta
>>rules/etc. I didn't see this as an option.
>>
>>As it seems, if you have the same phrase in both the body and subject,
>>you cannot tell if it actually appears in the body at all. You can only
>>determine that it is in the subject, and _might_ be in the body.
>>
>>Of course if it is in the body but NOT in the subject, a metarule will
>>help but that's not what I'm going for.
>>
>>Any ideas here? I thank you again.
>>Michael
>>    
>>
>
>Why would you prefer to do it without META rules?  I personally would use
>META rules in a manner something like (completely untested, off the top of
>my head):
>
>header __LOCAL_SUBJ_FOOEY   Subject =~ /fooey/i
>body __LOCAL_BODY_FOOEY /fooey/i
>
>meta LOCAL_MY_FOOEY (__LOCAL_BODY_FOOEY && !_LOCAL_SUB_FOOEY)
>score LOCAL_MY_FOOEY 0.1
>
>or something similar... been awhile since i wrote SA rules.
>
>hope this helps
>
>alan
>
>_______________________________________________
>Visit http://www.mimedefang.org and http://www.canit.ca
>MIMEDefang mailing list
>MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
>http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
>  
>