[Mimedefang] Problem running clamd but not clamscan

[Scott Harris]

> Scott, et al -
> 	I had similar issues with clamd versus clamscan (see
> lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2003-December/01
> 8671.html)
> but nobody else seemed to (or at least, nobody responded) and 
> I gave up due to lack of time. (Figuring, "I've got a 
> solution that works for my current mail load, why fsck with it...")
> 
> 		Ole
> --

I'm tempted to take the same route, except for the fact that 
I noticed the filter time has gone up dramatically:

Random cut/paste with clamd
Jan 28 00:24:01 linux1 mimedefang[11848]: i0S8O0R5011847: Filter time is
136ms
Jan 28 00:27:03 linux1 mimedefang[11865]: i0S8R3i4011864: Filter time is
170ms
Jan 28 00:27:15 linux1 mimedefang[11877]: i0S8RFG8011876: Filter time is
213ms
Jan 28 00:33:49 linux1 mimedefang[11899]: i0S8XnOI011898: Filter time is
214ms


Random cut/paste with clamscan
Jan 28 07:28:14 linux1 mimedefang[13723]: i0SFRqHI013722: Filter time is
1823ms
Jan 28 07:29:39 linux1 mimedefang[13728]: i0SFTb1c013727: Filter time is
765ms
Jan 28 07:41:55 linux1 mimedefang[13771]: i0SFfsAG013770: Filter time is
1397ms
Jan 28 07:52:26 linux1 mimedefang[13826]: i0SFqPxB013825: Filter time is
1211ms
Jan 28 07:58:18 linux1 mimedefang[13854]: i0SFwG2L013853: Filter time is
1112ms