[Mimedefang] Idea.. spell checking?

[David F. Skoll]

On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Kenneth Porter wrote:

> > That is not a good idea unless you have already built up a substantial
> > Bayes database, and even then I wouldn't recommend it.

> IIRC, SA doesn't start using Bayes until a couple hundred hams and spams
> have been read. At that point the number of legitimate new tokens should be
> relatively small.

Not in my experience.  I get new tokens all the time -- phone numbers,
names, addresses, and the like.  Weighing them as spammy would cause
a lot of problems.

Regards,

David.