[Mimedefang] socket unsafe? What the heck??
G. Roderick Singleton
gerry at pathtech.org
Sat Jun 28 19:40:01 EDT 2003
On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 19:16, Michael W. Cocke wrote:
> Sorry about the wrap - these are from my maillog file. Since I have
> no idea what the error means, I don't have a clue where to look for
> whatever I've done wrong <sigh> The path exists and has the
> permissions and ownership the README file specifies.
>
> Jun 28 19:06:23 badlands sendmail[4989]: h5SN6NeR004989: Milter
> (mimedefang): local socket name /var/spool/MIMEDefang/mimedefang.sock
> unsafe
>
> Jun 28 19:06:23 badlands sendmail[4989]: h5SN6NeR004989: Milter
> (mimedefang): to error state
>
> Jun 28 19:06:23 badlands sendmail[4989]: h5SN6NeR004989: Milter:
> initialization failed, temp failing commands
>
> Any clues?
>
> Mike-
>
>
When I had this problem, it turned out to be a spelling error in my
sendmail.mc. e.g. MIMEdefang != MIMEDefang. If you cut an pasted this is
a likely source for the error you see.
--
Gerry Roderick Singleton <gerry at pathtech.org>
416-452-4583
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list