[Mimedefang] MIMEDefang timeouts (again) (fwd)

Mitch at 0Bits.COM Mitch at 0Bits.COM
Wed Jul 9 18:22:05 EDT 2003


Ok, it looks like it was 0.98 of Unix::Syslog

Wierd though, since I don't see much relevant between the 0.98 and
0,99. Maybe a compiler/lib mismatch perhaps. I'm sure i wont be able
to reproduce with 0.98 either if i recompile.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2003 23:08:50 +0100 (BST)
From: Mitch at 0Bits.COM
To: G. Roderick Singleton <gerry at pathtech.org>
Cc: mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang timeouts (again) (fwd)


I'll have to get it from backups since i (obviously) overwrote
it with the 0.99.

I will post once i have the details (shortly).


P.s. Thanks Kevin for pointing out the Unix-Syslog-0.100. And
no, i didn't have the 100 version, must've been some earlier version.
I wonder why this module is not in the stock perl 5.8.0 tree ?

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang timeouts (again) (fwd)
Date: 09 Jul 2003 17:46:22 -0400
From: G. Roderick Singleton <gerry at pathtech.org>
Reply-To: mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
Organization: PATH tech
To: MimeDefang <mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0307092052050.2884 at mx.homelinux.com>

On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 16:51, Mitch at 0Bits.COM wrote:
> Thanks to Davids help on how to manually run MD on a rogue email,
> i've trapped this bug !
> After a lot of printf()'s in mimedefang.pl, it appeared that
> was hanging the process.
> I retrieved the latest from
> 	http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Unix
> and everything is now fine !!!

Can you please identify the offending version of Unix::Syslog?

Gerry Roderick Singleton <gerry at pathtech.org>

MIMEDefang mailing list
MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com

More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list