[Mimedefang] Powerful anti-spam rule that never discards vali d e-mail

[David F. Skoll]

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Mycrom wrote:

> This all is a good idea but you guys need to change the thinking a little.
> Issuing a 4XX to all messages will cause the message to be delayed in most
> cases. The remote mta will take it and stick it into its little pocket until
> next queue run.

No; if there are multiple MX records, the MTA should immediately try the
next MX record down.

--
David.