[Mimedefang] Sitewide Bayes

[Kevin A. McGrail]

True, but I am assuming that SA discussions regarding procmail (or any
method not using MIMEDefang) *on* the MIMEDefang list would be a bit
non-related to the purpose of the list.

KAM
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lucas Albers" <admin at cs.montana.edu>
To: <mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] Sitewide Bayes


> If you run SA via procmail and tag the mail rather then reject at the smtp
> level, the users don't have to configure the bayes.
> I use this method: user bayes but not site wide bayes.
>
> > I disagree.  Unless your users are technically savvy, the average
customer
> > will never use Bayesian rules.
> >
> > Therefore, I think it comes down to: is Bayesian site-wide better for a
> > server where the users would never individually seed the bayesian
filters?
> >
> > KAM
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIMEDefang mailing list
> MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
>