[Mimedefang] Sitewide Bayes

[Kevin A. McGrail]

I disagree.  Unless your users are technically savvy, the average customer
will never use Bayesian rules.

Therefore, I think it comes down to: is Bayesian site-wide better for a
server where the users would never individually seed the bayesian filters?

KAM
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lucas Albers" <admin at cs.montana.edu>
To: <mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com>
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 1:40 PM
Subject: [Mimedefang] Sitewide Bayes


> Imo
> It is not prudent to run a single site-wide bayes for your mail server.
> As David said awhile ago, every one considers different mail as spam.
> So having a account to forward mail to as spam for bayesian learning,
> shoule have a fairly high false-positive rate.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIMEDefang mailing list
> MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
>