[Mimedefang] spamass-milter or mimedefang ?

Kevin A. McGrail kmcgrail at pccc.com
Mon Aug 25 09:38:00 EDT 2003


I'd agree.  SpamAss-Milter just languished and even though I reported
several bugs, they were never even replied to.  I eventually deprecated the
how-to I wrote for that and wholeheartedly recommend MIMEDefang.

KAM
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tielman Koekemoer" <tielman at staff.vista.ac.za>
To: <mimedefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com>
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:17 AM
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] spamass-milter or mimedefang ?


> > what's the best way to integrate spamassassin via sendmail's milter
> > functionality in sendmail: spamass-milter or mimedefang?
>
> I found that in a production environment my spamass-milter died for no
> reason. Mimedefang on the other hand is more configurable and more
> stable.
>
> Tielman
>
> _________________________
> Content and Virus scanned
>  by  Inflex  and  Mcafee
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIMEDefang mailing list
> MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
>




More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list