[Mimedefang] Archiving email
Clayton, Nik [IT]
nik.clayton at citigroup.com
Mon Sep 16 06:55:00 EDT 2002
> Ole Craig wrote:
> > Moreover, your phrasing of "political reasons" suggest that
> things are
> > already to the point where somebody is unhappy,
>
> If the "political" reasons are anything like a note I heard in last
> night's news, governments in several places are looking at *requiring*
> ISPs to archive all email to/from/within their systems. Should that
> happen, it's probably still a good idea to note the fact in SMTP
> greetings or email headers...
For some things it's already a requirement. SEC regs mandate that we
archive all Internet mail (in and out) for several years, and a fair
chunk of the internal mail as well.
> Ugh. I work for a *small* ISP, and we process around 3G of mail per
> week (in/out/within). That doesn't include our corporate
> customers that
> host their own mailservers, or our domain hosting service. We can't
> *afford* the disk space required to store that email...
We shift ~ 10G a week in and out (just Internet, that doesn't include
internal mail).
There are companies that specialise in doing exactly this sort of
archiving. Although the category says "Document Management", many of
the companies at
http://dir.yahoo.com/Business_and_Economy/Business_to_Business/Computers/Sof
tware/Business_Applications/Document_Management/
will archive e-mail as well. Technically, this can be as simple as
silently adding an additional recipient to each in/outbound message of
something like
my_company_name at company-that-does-my-archiving.com
and then company-that-does-my-archiving.com provides all the tools for
searching back through the archive, and have the headache of actually
storing all that data.
N
--
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
-- The 75 column-ometer
Contributing to the heat death
Global Messaging, 120 Cheapside, x83331 of the universe since 1973.
More information about the MIMEDefang
mailing list