[Mimedefang] SpamAssassin 2.40 experiences?

[Stephane Lentz]

HI David, 

On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 12:40:06PM -0400, David F. Skoll wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I downloaded SA 2.40, and tested it against a "canonical" spam
> message I keep for that purpose.  Against 2.31, the message scored
> 9.4, but against 2.40, it scored -0.10!  Needless to say, I was
> shocked!
> 
> Do people find the weights in 2.40 are accurate, or is there a problem
> here?  I'm sticking with 2.31 for now...
> 
I plan to use SpamAssassin and was waiting for 2.40.
Looking at the mailing list I see various problems (perl code, 
scores, ...). There is some 2.41i-cvs in the CVS and I read
that 2.41 should be released in a near future. 
I'm gonna hold my breath for 2.41. 

David, maybe 2.41-cvs has better weights yet. 

Regards, 

SL/ 
---
Stephane Lentz / Alcanet International - Internet Services