[Mimedefang] Server load

Dirk Mueller dmuell at gmx.net
Fri Oct 11 09:39:00 EDT 2002


On Fre, 11 Okt 2002, David F. Skoll wrote:

> > Replace ext3 by reiser. Reiser is a lot faster during creating and deleting 
> > small files, which is what mimedefang is most of the time doing. 
> Nick Christenson, in "Sendmail Performance Tuning" (Addison-Wesley),
> ran tests and found ext3 to be significantly faster than Reiser.

(aren't books about computer software always too old when they're printed?)

> often coalesce the create/delete journal entries into essentially a
> no-op.  If you do not quickly delete the files, then ext3 is not so
> good.

This is what more recent reiserfs does as well. Of course when you keep 
running old software you won't get the speedup. 

Anyway, I think this is becoming slightly offtopic..

I do agree that putting it on a RAM disk is the best thing, as long as the 
spool dir is not growing beyond certain limits. But sometimes bigger mails 
stuck in the spool directory, so they will fill up the RAM disc, destroying 
the small performance benefit you got. 


-- 
Dirk (received 400 mails today)



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list