[Mimedefang] Possible Attack?

[Albert E. Whale]

On Wed, 1 May 2002, David F. Skoll wrote:

> > Are these messages valid?
>
> It depends on your definition of "valid". :-)
>
> > Apr 28 17:24:17 access sendmail[30994]: g3SLOGXl030987: Truncated MIME
> > Content-Type header due to field size (length = 44) (possible attack)
>
> Somebody is setting the (undocumented) MaxMimeHeaderLength value in
> your configuration file.  These are Sendmail messages, not MIMEDefang
> messages.

What is a reasonable setting for this?

>
> Regards,
>
> David.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MIMEDefang mailing list
> MIMEDefang at lists.roaringpenguin.com
> http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/mailman/listinfo/mimedefang
>