[Mimedefang] mimedefang 2.0 versus 2.3 beta 3

David F. Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com
Thu Jan 10 16:08:21 EST 2002

On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Young, Gil wrote:

> I am wondering if I
> should take this opportunity to upgrade the mimedefang software as well, and
> is the latest release deemed "stable"?

I consider 2.2 stable.  I have it installed in several locations and have not
had problems.  I only use it in multiplexor mode.

The box running this list is running 2.3-BETA-3, and hasn't had problems yet...



More information about the MIMEDefang mailing list